0.08/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.08/0.13	% Command    : run_vampire %s %d THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 180
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 05:26:54 EDT 2024
0.13/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.13/0.36	This is a THF_ problem
0.13/0.36	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.13/0.37	Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire_ho --cores 7 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cO0QTgRBiV/E---3.1_30184.p -m 16384 -t 180
0.13/0.38	% (30416)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30184 for (1799ds/18Mi)
0.13/0.39	% (30411)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30184 for (1799ds/4Mi)
0.13/0.39	% (30413)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30184 for (1799ds/2Mi)
0.13/0.39	% (30410)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30184 for (1799ds/183Mi)
0.13/0.39	% (30412)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30184 for (1799ds/27Mi)
0.13/0.39	% (30415)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30184 for (1799ds/275Mi)
0.13/0.39	% (30414)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30184 for (1799ds/2Mi)
0.13/0.39	% (30413)Instruction limit reached!
0.13/0.39	% (30413)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30413)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.13/0.39	% (30413)Termination reason: Unknown
0.13/0.39	% (30414)Instruction limit reached!
0.13/0.39	% (30414)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30414)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.13/0.39	% (30413)Termination phase: Saturation
0.13/0.39	
0.13/0.39	% (30413)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.13/0.39	% (30413)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
0.13/0.39	% (30413)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
0.13/0.39	% (30413)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30413)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30414)Termination reason: Unknown
0.13/0.39	% (30414)Termination phase: Property scanning
0.13/0.39	
0.13/0.39	% (30414)Memory used [KB]: 895
0.13/0.39	% (30414)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
0.13/0.39	% (30414)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
0.13/0.39	% (30414)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30414)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30416)Instruction limit reached!
0.13/0.39	% (30416)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30416)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.13/0.39	% (30416)Termination reason: Unknown
0.13/0.39	% (30416)Termination phase: Saturation
0.13/0.39	
0.13/0.39	% (30416)Memory used [KB]: 5628
0.13/0.39	% (30416)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
0.13/0.39	% (30416)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
0.13/0.39	% (30416)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30416)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30411)Instruction limit reached!
0.13/0.39	% (30411)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30411)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.13/0.39	% (30411)Termination reason: Unknown
0.13/0.39	% (30411)Termination phase: Saturation
0.13/0.39	
0.13/0.39	% (30411)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.13/0.39	% (30411)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
0.13/0.39	% (30411)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.13/0.39	% (30411)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30411)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30412)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.13/0.39	% (30412)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30412)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.13/0.39	% (30412)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.13/0.39	
0.13/0.39	
0.13/0.39	% (30412)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.13/0.39	% (30412)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
0.13/0.39	% (30412)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
0.13/0.39	% (30412)------------------------------
0.13/0.39	% (30412)------------------------------
0.22/0.40	% (30426)lrs+2_16:1_acc=model:au=on:bd=off:c=on:e2e=on:nm=2:sos=all:i=15:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30184 for (1799ds/15Mi)
0.22/0.40	% (30415)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.22/0.40	% (30415)------------------------------
0.22/0.40	% (30415)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.22/0.40	% (30415)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.22/0.40	
0.22/0.40	
0.22/0.40	% (30415)Memory used [KB]: 5628
0.22/0.40	% (30415)Time elapsed: 0.015 s
0.22/0.40	% (30415)Instructions burned: 20 (million)
0.22/0.40	% (30415)------------------------------
0.22/0.40	% (30415)------------------------------
0.22/0.40	% (30426)First to succeed.
0.22/0.40	% (30424)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30184 for (1799ds/3Mi)
0.22/0.40	% (30425)lrs+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=14:prag=on:sp=weighted_frequency:tnu=1:i=37:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_30184 for (1799ds/37Mi)
0.22/0.41	% (30426)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.22/0.41	% SZS status Theorem for E---3.1_30184
0.22/0.41	% SZS output start Proof for E---3.1_30184
0.22/0.41	thf(func_def_3, type, sP0: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $o).
0.22/0.41	thf(func_def_4, type, sP1: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $o).
0.22/0.41	thf(func_def_5, type, sK2: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.22/0.41	thf(func_def_6, type, sK3: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.22/0.41	thf(func_def_7, type, sK4: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.22/0.41	thf(func_def_8, type, sK5: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.22/0.41	thf(func_def_9, type, sK6: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.22/0.41	thf(func_def_10, type, sK7: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i).
0.22/0.41	thf(func_def_11, type, sK8: (($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.22/0.41	thf(func_def_13, type, ph10: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
0.22/0.41	thf(f189,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  $false),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f55,f74,f83,f133,f142,f151,f169,f174,f179,f181,f184,f185,f188])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f188,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) != (sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) | ((sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) != (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) | ((sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(theory_tautology_sat_conflict,[])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f185,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) != (sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) | ($false != (sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))) | ($false = (sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(theory_tautology_sat_conflict,[])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f184,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ($false != (sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true)))))) | ($false != (sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))) | ((sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) != $true) | ((sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true))))) = $true)),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(theory_tautology_sat_conflict,[])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f181,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) != (sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) | ($false != (sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true)))))) | ($false != (sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))) | ((sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) != $true) | ((sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true))))) = $true)),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(theory_tautology_sat_conflict,[])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f179,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ~spl9_17 | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f158,f48,f176])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f176,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_17 <=> ((sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_17])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f48,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_1 <=> ((sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true)),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_1])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f158,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) != (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f157])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f157,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) != $true) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f156])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f156,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) @ (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) != $true) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f155])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f155,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) @ (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) != $true) | ($true != $true) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(superposition,[],[f23,f50])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f50,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f48])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f23,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (((X0 @ (sK2 @ X0) @ (sK3 @ X0)) != $true) | ($true != (sP1 @ X0))) )),
0.22/0.41	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f13,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : ((((X0 @ (sK4 @ X0) @ (sK3 @ X0)) = $true) & ((X0 @ (sK2 @ X0) @ (sK3 @ X0)) != $true) & ($true = (X0 @ (sK2 @ X0) @ (sK4 @ X0)))) | ($true != (sP1 @ X0)))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f11,f12])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f12,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o,X3 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X3 @ X2) = $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) != $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X3) = $true)) => (((X0 @ (sK4 @ X0) @ (sK3 @ X0)) = $true) & ((X0 @ (sK2 @ X0) @ (sK3 @ X0)) != $true) & ($true = (X0 @ (sK2 @ X0) @ (sK4 @ X0)))))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f11,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o,X3 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X3 @ X2) = $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) != $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X3) = $true)) | ($true != (sP1 @ X0)))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f9])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f9,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o,X3 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X3 @ X2) = $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) != $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X3) = $true)) | ~($true = (sP1 @ X0)))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(predicate_definition_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[=])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f174,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_16 | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f161,f48,f171])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f171,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_16 <=> ((sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_16])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f161,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f160])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f160,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f159])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f159,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) @ (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f153])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f153,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) @ (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true) | ($true != $true) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(superposition,[],[f24,f50])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f24,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (((X0 @ (sK4 @ X0) @ (sK3 @ X0)) = $true) | ($true != (sP1 @ X0))) )),
0.22/0.41	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f169,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_15 | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f164,f48,f166])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f166,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_15 <=> ((sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_15])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f164,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f163])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f163,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f162])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f162,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) @ (sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f154])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f154,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ($true != $true) | (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) @ (sK4 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true) | ~spl9_1),
0.22/0.41	  inference(superposition,[],[f22,f50])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f22,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (($true != (sP1 @ X0)) | ($true = (X0 @ (sK2 @ X0) @ (sK4 @ X0)))) )),
0.22/0.41	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f151,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_13 | spl9_14 | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f121,f52,f148,f144])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f144,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_13 <=> ($false = (sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_13])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f148,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_14 <=> ($false = (sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_14])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f52,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_2 <=> ((sP0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true)),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_2])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f121,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ($false = (sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))) | ($false = (sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))) | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f119])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f119,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) != (sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))) | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f117])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f117,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ($true != $true) | ((sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) != (sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))) | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(superposition,[],[f26,f54])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f54,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sP0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true) | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f52])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f26,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (((sP0 @ X0) != $true) | ((sK6 @ X0 @ (sK7 @ X0)) != (sK5 @ X0 @ (sK7 @ X0)))) )),
0.22/0.41	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f18,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : ((((X0 @ (sK6 @ X0) @ (sK5 @ X0)) = $true) & ((sK6 @ X0 @ (sK7 @ X0)) != (sK5 @ X0 @ (sK7 @ X0))) & ((X0 @ (sK5 @ X0) @ (sK6 @ X0)) = $true)) | ((sP0 @ X0) != $true))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK5,sK6,sK7])],[f15,f17,f16])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f16,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ? [X3] : ((X2 @ X3) != (X1 @ X3)) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) = $true)) => (((X0 @ (sK6 @ X0) @ (sK5 @ X0)) = $true) & ? [X3] : ((sK6 @ X0 @ X3) != (sK5 @ X0 @ X3)) & ((X0 @ (sK5 @ X0) @ (sK6 @ X0)) = $true)))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f17,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X3] : ((sK6 @ X0 @ X3) != (sK5 @ X0 @ X3)) => ((sK6 @ X0 @ (sK7 @ X0)) != (sK5 @ X0 @ (sK7 @ X0))))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f15,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X2 @ X1) = $true) & ? [X3] : ((X2 @ X3) != (X1 @ X3)) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) = $true)) | ((sP0 @ X0) != $true))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(rectify,[],[f14])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f14,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X6 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X5 @ X6) = $true) & ? [X7] : ((X5 @ X7) != (X6 @ X7)) & ((X0 @ X6 @ X5) = $true)) | ((sP0 @ X0) != $true))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f8,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X6 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X5 @ X6) = $true) & ? [X7] : ((X5 @ X7) != (X6 @ X7)) & ((X0 @ X6 @ X5) = $true)) | ~((sP0 @ X0) = $true))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(predicate_definition_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[=])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f142,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_11 | spl9_12 | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f120,f52,f139,f135])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f135,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_11 <=> ((sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true)),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_11])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f139,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_12 <=> ((sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true)),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_12])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f120,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true) | ((sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK7 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true) | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f119])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f133,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_10 | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f124,f52,f129])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f129,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_10 <=> ((sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_10])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f124,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f123])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f123,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true) | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f122])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f122,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) @ (sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true) | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f118])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f118,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK5 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) @ (sK6 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) = $true) | ($true != $true) | ~spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(superposition,[],[f25,f54])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f25,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (((sP0 @ X0) != $true) | ((X0 @ (sK5 @ X0) @ (sK6 @ X0)) = $true)) )),
0.22/0.41	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f18])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f83,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_5 | spl9_3),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f78,f57,f80])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f80,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_5 <=> ($false = (sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true))))))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_5])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f57,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_3 <=> ((sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true))))) = $true)),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl9_3])])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f78,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ($false = (sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true)))))) | spl9_3),
0.22/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f77])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f77,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ($false = (sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true)))))) | ($true != $true) | spl9_3),
0.22/0.41	  inference(fool_paramodulation,[],[f58])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f58,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true))))) != $true) | spl9_3),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f57])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f74,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ~spl9_3),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f73])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f73,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  $false | ~spl9_3),
0.22/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f72])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f72,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ($true != $true) | ~spl9_3),
0.22/0.41	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f71])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f71,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true)))) @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true))))) @ (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true)))))) != $true) | ~spl9_3),
0.22/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f68])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f68,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true)))) @ (sK2 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true))))) @ (sK3 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true)))))) != $true) | ($true != $true) | ~spl9_3),
0.22/0.41	  inference(superposition,[],[f23,f59])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f59,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: ($true))))) = $true) | ~spl9_3),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f57])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f55,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  spl9_1 | spl9_2),
0.22/0.41	  inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f45,f52,f48])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f45,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sP0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true) | ((sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true)),
0.22/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f44])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f44,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ($true != $true) | ((sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true) | ((sP0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true)),
0.22/0.41	  inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f43])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f43,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true) | (((sK8 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = (sK8 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) != $true) | ((sP0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true)),
0.22/0.41	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f30])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f30,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ((sP1 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true) | (((^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))) @ (sK8 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) @ (sK8 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0)))))) != $true) | ((sP0 @ (^[Y0 : $i > $o]: ((^[Y1 : $i > $o]: (Y1 = Y0))))) = $true)),
0.22/0.41	  inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f28])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f28,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ( ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (((X0 @ (sK8 @ X0) @ (sK8 @ X0)) != $true) | ($true = (sP1 @ X0)) | ((sP0 @ X0) = $true)) )),
0.22/0.41	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f21,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (($true = (sP1 @ X0)) | ((X0 @ (sK8 @ X0) @ (sK8 @ X0)) != $true) | ((sP0 @ X0) = $true))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK8])],[f19,f20])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f20,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X1 : $i > $o] : ((X0 @ X1 @ X1) != $true) => ((X0 @ (sK8 @ X0) @ (sK8 @ X0)) != $true))),
0.22/0.41	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f19,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (($true = (sP1 @ X0)) | ? [X1 : $i > $o] : ((X0 @ X1 @ X1) != $true) | ((sP0 @ X0) = $true))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(rectify,[],[f10])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f10,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (($true = (sP1 @ X0)) | ? [X4 : $i > $o] : ((X0 @ X4 @ X4) != $true) | ((sP0 @ X0) = $true))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(definition_folding,[],[f7,f9,f8])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f7,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o,X3 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X3 @ X2) = $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) != $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X3) = $true)) | ? [X4 : $i > $o] : ((X0 @ X4 @ X4) != $true) | ? [X6 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X5 @ X6) = $true) & ? [X7] : ((X5 @ X7) != (X6 @ X7)) & ((X0 @ X6 @ X5) = $true)))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(flattening,[],[f6])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f6,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ! [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (? [X4 : $i > $o] : ((X0 @ X4 @ X4) != $true) | ? [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o,X3 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1 @ X2) != $true) & (((X0 @ X3 @ X2) = $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X3) = $true))) | ? [X6 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : (? [X7] : ((X5 @ X7) != (X6 @ X7)) & (((X0 @ X6 @ X5) = $true) & ((X0 @ X5 @ X6) = $true))))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f5,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (! [X4 : $i > $o] : ((X0 @ X4 @ X4) = $true) & ! [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o,X3 : $i > $o] : ((((X0 @ X3 @ X2) = $true) & ((X0 @ X1 @ X3) = $true)) => ((X0 @ X1 @ X2) = $true)) & ! [X6 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o] : ((((X0 @ X6 @ X5) = $true) & ((X0 @ X5 @ X6) = $true)) => ! [X7] : ((X5 @ X7) = (X6 @ X7))))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f4,plain,(
0.22/0.41	  ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (! [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o,X3 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X1 @ X3) & (X0 @ X3 @ X2)) => (X0 @ X1 @ X2)) & ! [X4 : $i > $o] : (X0 @ X4 @ X4) & ! [X5 : $i > $o,X6 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X6 @ X5) & (X0 @ X5 @ X6)) => ! [X7] : ((X6 @ X7) <=> (X5 @ X7))))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
0.22/0.41	  ~? [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (! [X3 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o,X4 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X3 @ X4) & (X0 @ X4 @ X5)) => (X0 @ X3 @ X5)) & ! [X3 : $i > $o] : (X0 @ X3 @ X3) & ! [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X2 @ X1) & (X0 @ X1 @ X2)) => ! [X3] : ((X2 @ X3) <=> (X1 @ X3))))),
0.22/0.41	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
0.22/0.41	thf(f1,conjecture,(
0.22/0.41	  ? [X0 : ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o] : (! [X3 : $i > $o,X5 : $i > $o,X4 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X3 @ X4) & (X0 @ X4 @ X5)) => (X0 @ X3 @ X5)) & ! [X3 : $i > $o] : (X0 @ X3 @ X3) & ! [X1 : $i > $o,X2 : $i > $o] : (((X0 @ X2 @ X1) & (X0 @ X1 @ X2)) => ! [X3] : ((X2 @ X3) <=> (X1 @ X3))))),
0.22/0.41	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.cO0QTgRBiV/E---3.1_30184.p',cTHM120I_pme)).
0.22/0.41	% SZS output end Proof for E---3.1_30184
0.22/0.41	% (30426)------------------------------
0.22/0.41	% (30426)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.22/0.41	% (30426)Termination reason: Refutation
0.22/0.41	
0.22/0.41	% (30426)Memory used [KB]: 5628
0.22/0.41	% (30426)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
0.22/0.41	% (30426)Instructions burned: 10 (million)
0.22/0.41	% (30426)------------------------------
0.22/0.41	% (30426)------------------------------
0.22/0.41	% (30407)Success in time 0.021 s
0.22/0.41	EOF
